Loading...
Search for: zareei--s--a
0.005 seconds

    Geopolymers vs. alkali-activated materials (AAMs): A comparative study on durability, microstructure, and resistance to elevated temperatures of lightweight mortars

    , Article Construction and Building Materials ; Volume 222 , 2019 , Pages 49-63 ; 09500618 (ISSN) Ameri, F ; Shoaei, P ; Zareei, S. A ; Behforouz, B ; Sharif University of Technology
    Elsevier Ltd  2019
    Abstract
    This paper studied the durability, microstructure, and fire behavior of lightweight mortars based on cement, metakaolin (MK), ultrafine ground granulated blast furnace slag (UGGBFS), ceramic waste powder (CWP), and clay brick waste powder (CBWP). Two sets of mixes were prepared with two types of lightweight aggregate including lightweight expanded clay aggregate (LECA) and pumice aggregate. Regarding the durability assessment, the electrical resistivity and water absorption of the mortars were measured. The UGGBFS-based alkali-activated mortar with pumice aggregate exhibited the highest electrical resistivity and lowest water absorption, while CBWP-based geopolymer mortar with LECA showed... 

    Corrigendum to “Geopolymers vs alkali-activated materials (AAMs): A comparative study on durability, microstructure, and resistance to elevated temperatures of lightweight mortars” [Constr. Build. Mater. 222 (2019) 9–63] (Construction and Building Materials (2019) 222 (49–63), (S0950061819315089), (10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.079))

    , Article Construction and Building Materials ; Volume 350 , 2022 ; 09500618 (ISSN) Ameri, F ; Shoaei, P ; Zareei, S. A ; Behforouz, B ; Sharif University of Technology
    Elsevier Ltd  2022
    Abstract
    The authors regret that there was an error in the caption of Fig. 15. The corrected caption for Fig. 15 as presented here. It is noteworthy that this change does not affect any of the conclusions. Fig. 15. SEM micrograph of geopolymer mortar with clay brick waste: (a) with LECA and magnification of 60×, (b) with pumice aggregates and magnification of 2000×, (c) with pumice aggregates and magnification of 500×, (d) with pumice aggregates and magnification of 1000×. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd  

    Corrigendum to “Partial replacement of copper slag with treated crumb rubber aggregates in alkali-activated slag mortar” [Constr. Build. Mater. 256 (2020) 119468] (Construction and Building Materials (2020) 256, (S0950061820314732), (10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119468))

    , Article Construction and Building Materials ; Volume 350 , 2022 ; 09500618 (ISSN) Ameri, F ; Shoaei, P ; Musaeei, H. R ; Zareei, S. A ; Ban, C. C ; Sharif University of Technology
    Elsevier Ltd  2022
    Abstract
    The authors regret that there was an error in the SEM images presented in Fig. 4 of the article. The corrected SEM images as presented here. It is noteworthy that this change does not affect any of the conclusions. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd