Corrigendum: “geopolymers vs. alkali-activated materials (AAMs): a comparative study on durability, microstructure, and resistance to elevated temperatures of lightweight mortars” (JCBM 222 (2019) (49–63), (S0950061819315089), (10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.079))

Ameri, F ; Sharif University of Technology | 2021

69 Viewed
  1. Type of Document: Article
  2. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122939
  3. Publisher: Elsevier Ltd , 2021
  4. Abstract:
  5. The authors regret that there was an error in the XRD pattern for pumice shown in Fig. 8. The authors have re-analyzed the pumice to address the concerns over the reliability of the pattern due to the presence of noises, and the updated XRD pattern has been shown in Fig. 8 here for more accuracy of the presented information. It is noteworthy that this change does not affect any of the conclusions. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
  6. Keywords:
  7. Lightweight mortar ; Geopolymer mortar ; Alkali-activated mortar ; Water absorption ; Microstructure ; Elevated temperatures ; Ceramic waste powder ; Clay brick waste powder ; Metakaolin
  8. Source: Construction and Building Materials ; Volume 283 , 2021 ; 09500618 (ISSN)
  9. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061821006991?via%3Dihub