Sharif Digital Repository

Pragmatic assessment and consistency in rating are among the subject matters which are still in need of more in-depth investigations. The significance of the issue is highlighted when remembering that inconsistency in ratings would surely damage the test fairness issue in assessment and lead to much diversity in ratings. The purpose of this study was investigating the criteria that native (American) and non-native (Iranian) English speaking teachers considered while rating the pragmatic productions of Iranian EFL learners regarding the two speech acts of compliment and compliment response. Overall, a hundred and twenty teachers (sixty native and sixty non-native raters) participated in this... 

Among different subfields of pragmatics some have been analyzed meticulously and some seem to be in a more stringent need of investigation. ILP rating is a novel branch of pragmatics studies through which various aspects and process of rating the L2 learners’ pragmatics knowledge are analyzed. Unfortunately, despite its great impact on learning and teaching second language, investigation of L2 raters’ behaviors and criteria has not been explored much. Problems in the process of ILP rating are very critical, as they can easily undermine the fairness of the test. Therefore, this study attempted to analyze overall 100 EFL teachers’ rating criteria (50 Iranian nonnative and 50 American native)...