Loading...

Is negative attention better than no attention? The comparative effects of ostracism and harassment at work

O'Reilly, J ; Sharif University of Technology | 2015

128 Viewed
  1. Type of Document: Article
  2. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0900
  3. Publisher: INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences , 2015
  4. Abstract:
  5. Ostracism has been recognized as conceptually and empirically distinct from harassment. Drawing from theory and research that suggests that employees have a strong need to belong in their organizations, we examine the comparative frequency and impact of ostracism and harassment in organizations across three field studies. Study 1 finds that a wide range of employees perceive ostracism, compared with harassment, to be more socially acceptable, less psychologically harmful, and less likely to be prohibited in their organization. Study 2 surveyed employees from a variety of organizations to test our theory that ostracism is actually a more harmful workplace experience than harassment. Supporting our predictions, compared with harassment, ostracism was more strongly and negatively related to a sense of belonging and to various measures of employee well-being and work-related attitudes. We also found that the effects of ostracism on well-being and work-related attitudes were at least partially mediated by a sense of belonging. Study 3 replicated the results of Study 2 with data collected from employees of a large organization and also investigated the comparative impact of ostracism and harassment on employee turnover. Ostracism, but not harassment, significantly predicted actual turnover three years after ostracism and harassment were assessed, and this was mediated by a sense of belonging (albeit at p < 0010). Implications for theory, research, and practice are discussed
  6. Keywords:
  7. Belongingness ; Harassment ; Ostracism ; Well-being
  8. Source: Organization Science ; Volume 26, Issue 3 , 2015 , Pages 774-793 ; 10477039 (ISSN)
  9. URL: http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2014.0900