Loading...

Effects of engine speed and accessory load on idling emissions from heavy-duty diesel truck engines

Brodrick, C. J ; Sharif University of Technology | 2002

1 Viewed
  1. Type of Document: Article
  2. DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2002.10470838
  3. Publisher: 2002
  4. Abstract:
  5. A nontrivial portion of heavy-duty vehicle emissions of NOx and particulate matter (PM) occurs during idling. Regulators and the environmental community are interested in curtailing truck idling emissions, but current emissions models do not characterize them accurately, and little quantitative data exist to evaluate the relative effectiveness of various policies. The objectives of this study were to quantify the effect of accessory loading and engine speed on idling emissions from a properly functioning, modern, heavy-duty diesel truck and to compare these results with data from earlier model year vehicles. It was found that emissions during idling varied greatly as a function of engine model year, engine speed, and accessory load conditions. For the 1999 model year Class 8 truck tested, raising the engine speed from 600 to 1050 rpm and turning on the air conditioning resulted in a 2.5-fold increase in NOx emissions in grams per hour, a 2-fold increase in CO2 emissions, and a 5-fold increase in CO emissions while idling. On a grams per gallon fuel basis, NOx emissions while idling were approximately twice as high as those at 55 mph. The CO2 emissions at the two conditions were closer. The NOx emissions from the 1999 truck while idling with air conditioning running were slightly more than those of two 1990 model year trucks under equivalent conditions, and the hydrocarbon (HC) and CO emissions were significantly lower. It was found that the NOx emissions used in the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) EMFAC2000 and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) MOBILE5b emissions inventory models were lower than those measured in all of the idling conditions tested on the 1999 truck
  6. Keywords:
  8. Source: Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association ; Volume 52, Issue 9 , 2002 , Pages 1026-1031 ; 10962247 (ISSN)
  9. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10473289.2002.10470838