Loading...

Accuracy Quantification of the Reverse Engineering and High-Order Finite Element Analysis of Equine MC3 Forelimb

Mouloodi, S ; Sharif University of Technology | 2019

681 Viewed
  1. Type of Document: Article
  2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.04.004
  3. Publisher: W.B. Saunders , 2019
  4. Abstract:
  5. Shape is a key factor in influencing mechanical responses of bones. Considered to be smart viscoelastic and inhomogeneous materials, bones are stimulated to change shape (model and remodel) when they experience changes in the compressive strain distribution. Using reverse engineering techniques via computer-aided design (CAD) is crucial to create a virtual environment to investigate the significance of shape in biomechanical engineering. Nonetheless, data are lacking to quantify the accuracy of generated models and to address errors in finite element analysis (FEA). In the present study, reverse engineering through extrapolating cross-sectional slices was used to reconstruct the diaphysis of 15 equine third metacarpal bones (MC3). The reconstructed geometry was aligned with, and compared against, computed tomography–based models (reference models) of these bones and then the error map of the generated surfaces was plotted. The minimum error of reconstructed geometry was found to be +0.135 mm and -0.185 mm (0.407 mm ± 0.235, P > .05 and −0.563 mm ± 0.369, P > .05 for outside [convex] and inside [concave] surface position, respectively). Minor reconstructed surface error was observed on the dorsal cortex (0.216 mm ± 0.07, P > .05) for the outside surface and −0.185 mm ± 0.13, P > .05 for the inside surface. In addition, a displacement-based error estimation was used on 10 MC3 to identify poorly shaped elements in FEA, and the relations of finite element convergence analysis were used to present a framework for minimizing stress and strain errors in FEA. Finite element analysis errors of 3%–5% provided in the literature are unfortunate. Our proposed model, which presents an accurate FEA (error of 0.12%) in the smallest number of iterations possible, will assist future investigators to maximize FEA accuracy without the current runtime penalty
  6. Keywords:
  7. Adaptive mesh refinement ; Convergence and error analysis ; Equine third metacarpal bone (MC3) ; Error of reconstructed geometry ; Finite element analysis (FEA) ; Reverse engineering ; Computer assisted tomography ; Controlled study ; Diaphysis ; Equus ; Finite element analysis ; Forelimb ; Geometry ; Metacarpal bone ; Nonhuman ; Punishment ; Quantitative analysis ; Stress ; Error
  8. Source: Journal of Equine Veterinary Science ; Volume 78 , 2019 , Pages 94-106 ; 07370806 (ISSN)
  9. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0737080619300930