Loading...

Application of unmanned aerial vehicle Dem in flood modeling and comparison with global dems: case study of atrak river basin, Iran

Parizi, E ; Sharif University of Technology | 2022

98 Viewed
  1. Type of Document: Article
  2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115492
  3. Publisher: Academic Press , 2022
  4. Abstract:
  5. Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) play a significant role in hydraulic modeling and flood risk management. This study initially investigated the effect of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) DEM resolutions, ranging from 1 m to 30 m, on flood characteristics, including the inundation area, mean flow depth, and mean flow velocity. Then, the errors of flood characteristics for global DEMs, comprising ALOS (30 m), ASTER (30 m), SRTM (30 m), and TDX (12 m) were quantified using UAV DEM measurements. For these purposes, the HEC-RAS 2D model in steady-state conditions was used to simulate the flood with return periods of 5- to 200 years along 20 km reach of Atrak River located in northeastern Iran. Results indicated when UAV DEM resolution decreased from 1 m to 30 m, inundation area and mean flow depth increased 17.0% (R2 = 0.94) and 10.2% (R2 = 0.96) respectively, while mean flow velocity decreased 16.8% (R2 = −0.94). Validation of the hydraulic modeling using the modified normalized difference water index demonstrated that the HEC-RAS 2D model in conjunction with UAV DEM simulates the flood with ⁓92% accuracy. Comparing the global DEMs with UAV DEM showed that the root mean square error (RMSE) values of the flow depth for ASTER, SRTM, ALOS, and TDX DEMs were 1.77, 1.12, 1.02, and 0.93 m, and the RMSE values of the flow velocity for the same DEMs were 0.81, 0.66, 0.55, and 0.47 m/s, respectively. Furthermore, TDX DEM with a 6.15% error in the inundation area was the nearest to UAV measurements. Overall, TDX DEM revealed a better performance in hydraulic modeling of the fluvial flood characteristics. Hence, it is recommended for environments where high-resolution topography data is scarce. The results of this study could potentially serve as a guideline for selecting global DEMs for hydraulic simulations. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd
  6. Keywords:
  7. Atrak river basin ; Digital elevation model ; Flood modeling ; HEC-RAS 2D model ; Unmanned aerial vehicle ; Flow velocity ; Flooding ; Flow rate ; Iran ; Model ; Risk management ; River basin ; Root mean squared error ; Topography ; Water depth ; Atrak Basin
  8. Source: Journal of Environmental Management ; Volume 317 , 2022 ; 03014797 (ISSN)
  9. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479722010659