Loading...

A review of global gas flaring and venting and impact on the environment: Case study of Iran

Soltanieh, M ; Sharif University of Technology

1654 Viewed
  1. Type of Document: Article
  2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.02.010
  3. Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
  4. Abstract:
  5. After a brief review of the global gas flaring and venting in oil industries including the emission of air pollutants and greenhouse gases and the amount of energy resources wasted, the focus is on Iran as a major oil producing and the world's third largest gas flaring country. Gas flaring is also practiced in natural gas industries, petroleum refining and petrochemical plants, although the level of emission is very low compared with emissions from oil production. The historical emission of these gases globally and Iran specifically, geographic location of emission sources, composition of gases, environmental impacts of gas flaring and the current and future projects to mitigate emissions are evaluated and discussed. Emission factor, an indication of efficiency in oil production, varies widely among oil production sites around the world, from near zero to more than 50 standard cubic meters of flare gas per barrel of oil produced with an average value of about 5. Iran's emission factor has fluctuated from around 1 to more than 16 according to the data of 1980–2012 with higher emission factors for offshore oil production. Data also show an increasing trend during 2010–2012 which could be due to the several technical reasons in oil productions as well as economic sanctions imposed on Iran. In addition, there is a great amount of uncertainty and discrepancies among various data sources in the emission factors due to the lack of actual measurements of the volume and composition of flare gas and the uncertainties in the data sources. This requires regulatory measures, investment by oil companies and international collaboration. The economic and technological constraints in implementing or delaying the gas flare reduction projects are evaluated and addressed, with successful case studies and best practices reviewed. In particular, the techno-economic constraints in implementing gas flaring reduction projects caused by international sanctions on Iran are analyzed. It is shown that despite the great loss of energy resources due to gas flaring, its adverse impacts on the local and global environment and the availability of the technologies to reduce emissions, flaring is still practiced in many parts of the world, which can be avoided if the necessary regulatory policies and measures are established at national levels and international collaboration can facilitate the investment by providing the required finance and technologies. At present the international activities to implement gas flaring project activities under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) are very limited, but could be very effective in reducing emissions, if implemented. Due to the global demand and continued use of oil and gas in the next decades, there is an urgent need for reducing gas flaring emissions. This is not only the responsibility of the oil and gas companies, but also the responsibility of the national governments and the global community
  6. Keywords:
  7. CO2 emission ; Associated gas ; Carbon dioxide ; Climate change ; Emission control ; Energy resources ; Environmental impact ; Environmental regulations ; Environmental technology ; Gas emissions ; Gas industry ; Gas plants ; Gases ; Global warming ; Greenhouse gases ; International cooperation ; Investments ; Offshore oil well production ; Offshore oil wells ; Petrochemical plants ; Public utilities ; Uncertainty analysis ; Well stimulation ; Clean Development Mechanism ; Emission factors ; Gas flaring ; Impact on the environment ; International collaborations ; Reduction technologies ; Technological constraints ; United nations framework convention on climate changes ; Petroleum refining
  8. Source: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control ; Volume 49 , 2016 , Pages 488-509 ; 17505836 (ISSN)
  9. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583616300603