Loading...

Novel force–displacement control passive finite element models of the spine to simulate intact and pathological conditions; comparisons with traditional passive and detailed musculoskeletal models

Abbasi-Ghiri, A ; Sharif University of Technology | 2022

186 Viewed
  1. Type of Document: Article
  2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111173
  3. Publisher: Elsevier Ltd , 2022
  4. Abstract:
  5. Passive finite element (FE) models of the spine are commonly used to simulate intact and various pre- and postoperative pathological conditions. Being devoid of muscles, these traditional models are driven by simplistic loading scenarios, e.g., a constant moment and compressive follower load (FL) that do not properly mimic the complex in vivo loading condition under muscle exertions. We aim to develop novel passive FE models that are driven by more realistic yet simple loading scenarios, i.e., in vivo vertebral rotations and pathological-condition dependent FLs (estimated based on detailed musculoskeletal finite element (MS-FE) models). In these novel force–displacement control FE models, unlike the traditional passive FE models, FLs vary not only at different spine segments (T12-S1) but between intact, pre- and postoperative conditions. Intact, preoperative degenerated, and postoperative fused conditions at the L4-L5 segment for five static in vivo activities in upright and flexed postures were simulated by the traditional passive FE, novel force–displacement control FE, and gold-standard detailed MS-FE spine models. Our findings indicate that, when compared to the MS-FE models, the force–displacement control passive FE models could accurately predict the magnitude of disc compression force, intradiscal pressure, annulus maximal von Mises stress, and vector sum of all ligament forces at adjacent segments (L3-L4 and L5-S1) but failed to predict disc shear and facet joint forces. In this regard, the force–displacement control passive FE models were much more accurate than the traditional passive FE models. Clinical recommendations made based on traditional passive FE models should, therefore, be interpreted with caution. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd
  6. Keywords:
  7. Model ; Spine ; Finite element method ; Loads (forces) ; Muscle ; Adjacent segment ; Displacement ; Finite element modelling (FEM) ; Force ; Force displacement ; In-vivo ; Musculoskeletal ; Passive finite element ; Pathological conditions ; Displacement control ; Animal experiment ; Animal model ; Body position ; Compression ; Controlled study ; Finite element analysis ; Gold standard ; Human ; In vivo study ; Ligament ; Nonhuman ; Physiological stress ; Rotation ; Simulation ; Zygapophyseal joint ; Biological model ; Biomechanics ; Intervertebral disk ; Joint characteristics and functions ; Lumbar vertebra ; Physiology ; Weight bearing ; Biomechanical phenomena ; Intervertebral disc ; Lumbar vertebrae ; Models, Biological ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Weight-Bearing
  8. Source: Journal of Biomechanics ; Volume 141 , 2022 ; 00219290 (ISSN)
  9. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0021929022002172